陈老师帮我看下spss中关于组间率的比较无显著差异的问题如何解决？

陈老师您好，我最近写了一篇文章，研究的是内镜下切除胃间质瘤过程中肿瘤破碎是否是引起腹膜肿瘤转移的危险因素。方法是比较破碎组和非破碎组腹膜肿瘤转移率，但实际上两组转移率没有差别，都没有发生腹膜转移的病例，据此我得出结论就说肿瘤破碎并不是腹膜转移的危险因素。

下面是表格

Table 3. Characteristicsand follow-up outcomes of “A1” and “B2”

Factors	Total    (n=75)	A    (n=14)	B    (n=61)	P value
Age (y)    Mean± SD    Tumor size (cm)    Median(Range)    Follow-up Time (m)	58.0±10.0       1.5 (0.3-4.0)	55.3±11.2       3.0 (0.8-4.0)	58.6±9.7       1.5 (0.3-3.5)	0.263       <0.001       0.655
Mean± SD	17.9±10.3	19.0±9.9	17.6±10.4
Peritoneal metastasis	0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)	1.000

1presented patients combined with perforation in tumor rupture group; 2patients combined with perforation in en bloc resection group; SD：standard deviation

下面是审稿人意见：

1. P-values and statistical significance areuncertainty measures, not effect measures. Statistical non-significanceindicates just uncertainty, which should not be interpreted as an argument forsimilarity. Please clarify the empirical support for the conclusion thatrupture may not be a risk factor. The ratio of the two metastasis rates with a95% confidence interval may provide such information.

2. The comparison of the two metastasis ratesshould include an adjustment for potential confounding bias. This is bestperformed using a statistical model.

我的问题，审稿人是什么意思啊，两组腹膜转移率一样，得不出结论吗，我该怎么回复审稿人

审稿人的建议是：...成为会员可查看全部，【点击成为会员】

谢谢陈老师，但是两组都是没有转移，一个都没有，P=1，我能不能就此得出肿瘤破碎不是腹膜转移的危险因素呢？

还有陈老师，两组都没有腹膜转移，无论四个表还是二元logistic回归都得不出95%CI，而且模型好像也建立不了，怎么办

...成为会员可查看全部，【点击成为会员】